I took inspiration from the interview on Veltroni La Stampa, 5 this month stating, inter alia, that it would come now "time to get to the real participation of workers the company and beyond, makes a real indictment of the PD and the forces on his left, so-called "progressive", together with the CGIL leaders and some of his "extreme ribs" to strongly defend the 'exists' opposing Paradoxically, in any form of innovation and change precisely understood as progress and evolution of the "status quo" in society in general and the labor market in particular
Location undoubtedly brave, especially outside the box to the left in this very delicate phase for the new balance of training in that area as well as in particular in PD Veltroni
But there it was to be expected and even the position of young Renzi and restless, Mayor PD in Florence with his usual courage and clarity that confirms that you acknowledge the leadership of the Democratic Party should be "scrapped" and replaced and that no would mean not being left to vote "no" for example, the Referendum for the future of Fiat Mirafiori plant in Turin
It 'important that the work there is first and above all, the Fiat is committed in this case, this time with their own money to invest, albeit under the new and different conditions have evolved quite In recent years, not only in Europe, in relation to traditional industrial relations that are necessarily deeply magazines plus for the needs of firms, more and more 'different in Technology, Product, Production Organization and Market with the common goal for the parties to an overall increase in productivity that will protect the company and do not depress wages
Specifically (I had written between my notes in computer already in early December),
these calls increased productivity ', with forecasts made for good though' only result of their evaluations are certainly to be considered essential for a company that has invested so much and in an industrial project, and this for the good of all that protection for the Company on the achievement of objectives and necessary for the subsequent development of the project for Workers who keep their jobs if anything increased over time with
of units' work to be included in ever increasing numbers in projection towards the development of production processes
also essential for the Territory in which you develop the project in question enjoying its benefits that more 'important in the future, with the development of ancillary industries and so on for a general welfare of the whole area
But those who protect the workers? Since 1993 a lot and 'changed! Undoubtedly
Marchionne wants to present investors with a lean agile company without the ballast of the influence of working-class base rather to project just started, but now more 'than ever doing business means even in a country like ours, try to ensure the highest possible security to ensure a maximum contrast, loss of time and the classic .. "spanner in the works" to start production, then along the way when it would be difficult and very expensive to stay or go back, any degree of certainty is necessary, if not indispensable, to the Company that begins the adventure
not forget the difficulties, inter alia, 'the world of the period we are now experiencing some year!
But this degree of certainty should also require them to workers with 'Business start on this journey; Workers to pay more', to meet the new targets, but that because of this, when the results of management of the company are positive, in virtu 'precisely the convergence of efforts of all, well it would give them a stake in the capital of the prize for which they work and good and never again,' if things go wrong be they the only ones who have to pay
Marchionne and 'hard but very serious and responsible when it continues to "thunder", "Fiat intends to follow the investment programs only if the time arrangements and working conditions will ensure maximum efficiency 'and again: "in case of victory of the" no "to the referendum on the future of the Mirafiori plant in Turin, Fiat will be forced to relocate production leaving Turin
But why', as already 'mentioned, do not allow workers to participate in corporate profits in terms of innovation and social justice?
Provide for example, a Solidarity Fund Annual 'Business in advantageous conditions, if anything, in addition to the pension funds, etc. in relation to any regular supervening need to protect workers, though in some way directly linking pay to profits Business
No blackmail, but each of the Parties which by its legitimate interests in the share of the Company's growth and overall development of the area allocation of Activity '
Perche' no one has ever proposed a solution I like this 'from the right, it' from the left and especially from the unions?
now and 'later, the polls closed in Turin, with a great turnout by the workers, as for Pomigliano expect to know the outcome of this referendum at times
The important thing, however,' not now 'so much result that seems obvious in favor of "yes" but that it has raised a real problem that real and important already 'time should have been addressed and that will certainly have helped to make us all a bit' more 'responsible, each in its role
gianni Tavano
http://lavoro-solidarieta-progresso.blogspot.com/
But there it was to be expected and even the position of young Renzi and restless, Mayor PD in Florence with his usual courage and clarity that confirms that you acknowledge the leadership of the Democratic Party should be "scrapped" and replaced and that no would mean not being left to vote "no" for example, the Referendum for the future of Fiat Mirafiori plant in Turin
It 'important that the work there is first and above all, the Fiat is committed in this case, this time with their own money to invest, albeit under the new and different conditions have evolved quite In recent years, not only in Europe, in relation to traditional industrial relations that are necessarily deeply magazines plus for the needs of firms, more and more 'different in Technology, Product, Production Organization and Market with the common goal for the parties to an overall increase in productivity that will protect the company and do not depress wages
Specifically (I had written between my notes in computer already in early December),
these calls increased productivity ', with forecasts made for good though' only result of their evaluations are certainly to be considered essential for a company that has invested so much and in an industrial project, and this for the good of all that protection for the Company on the achievement of objectives and necessary for the subsequent development of the project for Workers who keep their jobs if anything increased over time with
of units' work to be included in ever increasing numbers in projection towards the development of production processes
also essential for the Territory in which you develop the project in question enjoying its benefits that more 'important in the future, with the development of ancillary industries and so on for a general welfare of the whole area
But those who protect the workers? Since 1993 a lot and 'changed! Undoubtedly
Marchionne wants to present investors with a lean agile company without the ballast of the influence of working-class base rather to project just started, but now more 'than ever doing business means even in a country like ours, try to ensure the highest possible security to ensure a maximum contrast, loss of time and the classic .. "spanner in the works" to start production, then along the way when it would be difficult and very expensive to stay or go back, any degree of certainty is necessary, if not indispensable, to the Company that begins the adventure
not forget the difficulties, inter alia, 'the world of the period we are now experiencing some year!
But this degree of certainty should also require them to workers with 'Business start on this journey; Workers to pay more', to meet the new targets, but that because of this, when the results of management of the company are positive, in virtu 'precisely the convergence of efforts of all, well it would give them a stake in the capital of the prize for which they work and good and never again,' if things go wrong be they the only ones who have to pay
Marchionne and 'hard but very serious and responsible when it continues to "thunder", "Fiat intends to follow the investment programs only if the time arrangements and working conditions will ensure maximum efficiency 'and again: "in case of victory of the" no "to the referendum on the future of the Mirafiori plant in Turin, Fiat will be forced to relocate production leaving Turin
But why', as already 'mentioned, do not allow workers to participate in corporate profits in terms of innovation and social justice?
Provide for example, a Solidarity Fund Annual 'Business in advantageous conditions, if anything, in addition to the pension funds, etc. in relation to any regular supervening need to protect workers, though in some way directly linking pay to profits Business
No blackmail, but each of the Parties which by its legitimate interests in the share of the Company's growth and overall development of the area allocation of Activity '
Perche' no one has ever proposed a solution I like this 'from the right, it' from the left and especially from the unions?
now and 'later, the polls closed in Turin, with a great turnout by the workers, as for Pomigliano expect to know the outcome of this referendum at times
The important thing, however,' not now 'so much result that seems obvious in favor of "yes" but that it has raised a real problem that real and important already 'time should have been addressed and that will certainly have helped to make us all a bit' more 'responsible, each in its role
gianni Tavano
http://lavoro-solidarieta-progresso.blogspot.com/
0 comments:
Post a Comment